Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The uprising CyberWar

CYBERWAR By Patricia Smith
The main idea of this article is that there is a current Cyber Warfare going on between the U.S and Israel working together going against Iran and China. Another part of the main idea is that because of this current Cyber War the U.S is in danger because unlike China, Iran is trying to do harm to the U.S they're even trying to build a nuke that we're trying to prevent.

Details or evidence from the article is that inside the article Smith states that the U.S are saying Iran can possibly hack into our systems and mess up trains with passengers or even more dangerous trains containing nuclear equipment or uranium. Another detail from the text is how in the beginning Smith also discusses how Iran hacked into Saudi Arabia's oil company Saudi Aramco the most important oil company in the world and the company alone is valued at an estimate of $7 trillion and the hackers deleted alot of important information making more than 30,000 computers useless. One more peice of evidence I'll use is that China is in this little CyberWar but not to cause damage but to steal information basically the Cyber Scout/Cyber Spy of the "war" and what they're doing is that they're trying to hack into the pentagon and steal secrets that only the U.S Government possibly know.

In my opinion this CyberWar is pointless but then again you aren't going to sit by and just let someone hack into your computer system and steal very important information and that's clearly what the U.S Government and its ally Israel is thinking aswell because even though they won't tell anybody publicly they're in this little warfare aswell sending viruses and hacks into the computers of hackers from Iran and China to keep them from getting into their computers. The U.S Government or Israel also has something called stuxnet which is a sophisticated computer worm only effective to people who have anything that has to do with nuclear plans, plants, information and that worm took a major toll on the Iranians setting back their ability to create nuclear weapons by several year according to the article.

One connection I can add to this article is from when I was younger and I was on my PC and I saw an interesting looking ad that had something to do with some type of game where they have the little controls like you can actually play the game on the ad. I clicked the ad and it took me to a website that definetly wasn't a gaming website, my PC defense system detected the website trying to do major damage to my PC and force closed to page before it could do anything. If it wasn't for my defense my PC would've probably been completely tooken over and I had school information on their that I needed that I could've lost but luckily I didn't and to this day I never even look at ads instead I close them right away if optional if not I just don't look at them. 

This article has helped me to think more deeply of the topic because honestly I knew there was hacking going on but I never knew it was this serious until now. I didn't know people were trying to hack the U.S Goverment every day because I thought hacking was a minor thing that computer techies or "nerds" did in their spare time to get those extra points in that game or something of the sort.

This article did make me wonder about something. My wonder is, If Iran and China are succesful in hacking the U.S and Israel what kind of damage will Iran do and what kind of stuff will China do with the information they obtain?

Friday, February 22, 2013

Music can really be effective


The main idea of this article is how effective music can be to humans and how you can make the most divine sound you've ever heard or could make a terrible sound that could potentially hurt your ears. This article is also about researches currently studying how music has the effect on us as it does because currently there is no known reason for why music effects our emotions.

Details or evidence I have from the article is when the writer is giving examples of when music can effect us. The article says "Ever since ancient times, scholars have puzzled over the reasons that some musical note combinations sound so sweet while others are just downright dreadful." That is how the article starts off but that part fits as one of my details because the beginning lays out the rest of the article. Another detail from the article is how researchers are conducting tests/surveys on college students from Minnesota. Researcher Josh McDermott said  "The question is, what makes certain combinations of musical notes pleasant or unpleasant?" As he was testing the college students with a variety of musical and nonmusical sounds.

In my opinion I think this topic is rather interesting. However, I am just as curious as every other researcher currently trying to find this ultimate answer for why does music make us feel the way we feel when listening to it because it's been a question on my mind since I started listening to a lot more music.

One connection I can make to this is from my childhood and I know I'm about to go off topic but when I was younger I was very interested in drawing. I still am but back then I was just starting out and I used to look at my drawings and compare them to others with others with the help of an older sibling or my parents when they had time and I used to always look an artists picture and wonder "How does he draw like that?" But now that I'm older I realize it takes a lot of practice to do that and you have to let your mind explore sometimes. I've connected this to my blog because when you listen to music your mind does the same thing as when you draw, It explores, it wonders, it thinks.

This article has helped me to think deeply of the subject because as I said before this is an interesting topic.



Friday, February 15, 2013

Valentines Day Romance

Historically Incorrect Canoodling By NY TIMES Stephanie Coontz 
The main idea of this article is that people now and days are seperating love from sex and are just doing it for the pleasure. The article also talks about the origins of Valentines Day and what it was really about when it was first invented by the Roman Catholic Church thousands of years ago.

Details or evidence I have from the article is when it talks about the vvery first Valentines Day and how it was originally to keep sexual passion rates down but was later on changed centuries later by young people and it was from then on a holiday to "celebrate romantic love and sexual attraction." But even so marriage was still unbelieved in for achieving sexual fulfillment or anything of that category. More details/evidence I have from the article is when the church declared Feb. 14th the official day of the St. Valentine's feast day in 498 A.D. and even then the church didn't attend for it to celebrate romance, They were still trying to keep love and romance rates down.

In my opinion this article is a very interesting read. It really talks about the birth and origins of the day of romance and now I know alot more about the day. However I didn't expect the origins of the day to be what they are because it was to my knowledge that Valentines Day was always the day of love but Valentine a Christian priest never expected the day to be that way at all.

This article actually reminded me of Halloween. I always thought Halloween was the day of candy and tricks/treats but according to my parents the day is much darker than most kids know. According to my parents and I'm sure many other people Halloween is the Devil's holiday and therefore I'm not really able to celebrate it unless im going to my church to celebrate it but as a young child I loved Halloween and everything about it because it was really fun to always used to go to nice looking neighborhoods and go back home with big bags filled of candy.

This article has helped me to think more deeply on the topic because like I've said before I've never had any knowledge of the origins of Valentines Day until now and now that I know more about it I must say that the day seems a little messed up from my perspective but other than that the read as I've said before once again is an interesting one.

However something I'd like to know is how the write of this article Stephanie Coontz got the facts for this article. How do you know this much about the holiday? Where did you get your knowledge? Has the form of knowledge been passed down from generation to generation?



Friday, February 8, 2013

Greenland's New Popularity

The Great Race By Elisabeth Rosenthal of The NY Times
The main idea of this article is that Greenland is growing more and more popular but only because they finally have something to offer. Rare minerals such as minerals, gems, rare earth metals etc. essential in the crafting of Phones, wind turbines, and electric cars.

Details or evidence I have from the article is how Rosenthal is telling how Greenland has never been as important to us as they were back when to us now and that's only because they finally have something everyone wants since their ice is melting and more rare minerals and rare earth metals are being uncovered. Another peice of details or evidence I have is when the article describes how many countries are actually hunting down the rare minerals and trying to beat others to doing so.

In my opinion I'm kind of disappointed. I'm disappointed because all this rushing of the minerals in Greenland is probably going to lead to Greenland breaking apart from Denmark because they don't want them talking all of their oil, minerals, and rare earth metals and it's a shame that that's the only way they can keep Denmark out of their supplies. However it is not only Denmark Greenland has to watch out for because there are many other countries, capitols etc. that also want their rich oil, minerals, and rare earth metals for their only many advantages such as for more tools, weapons (probably), electronics etc.

I have no connection I can make to this article. However I do have a question and that question is why can't people keep calm and atleast try to work out an agreement?

Friday, February 1, 2013

Will the Majority soon become the Minority?

The New Face of America By Veronica Majerol

The main idea of this article is about more minorities being born than whites for the first time in awhile and this is important because the nations identity could have a huge change as we know it and many people may like this change while others may not.

Details or evidence I have on this article is when Jessica Ramirez, 22 said she was born to a Colombian mother and a Mexican father. However Jessica grew up in Phoenix, Arizona but despite this information Jessica didn't consider herself a part of the minority at all, she says "I felt that I was equal." Jessica is a senior at Arizona State university. She also says "The school I went to was predominantly Latino...So I just felt that I was normal." One more peice of evidence I have from the article is how it is proven by analysist that more of the minor races are being born in the U.S rather then whites.

In my opinion this is a good thing because that means that there will probably be more equality throughout all of the U.S since there will be less whites than any other race eventually in the future. This is also a good thing because if there are more of the minority races in the country then the governement and the laws of the U.S would have to apply to everyone and most likely be more fair than they are now.

There is no connection I can make to this article but I can say this article has helped me to think more deeply about the subject as always because now that I think about it I use to think the U.S was predominantly black but now I know that's only in certain parts of the city and because I mostly see black people but now I know that it's actually predominantly white but they're losing their predominance quickly as there are more and more babies of minor races being born everyday.

The only question I have is what do you as the reader think the U.S will be like in the future?